Choice Cuts by Mark Kurlansky
A good way to approach this delightful but extensive collection in a public library discussion would be for the librarian or the scholar to suggest in advance how readers might focus, to insure that everyone is familiar with some of the same sections. Discussion might focus on several chapters about particular types of food that correlate with other books selected for the series (chocolate, meat, spices), or purposefully on new subjects (fat, starch, vegetables). Readers might, alternately, pay special attention to the chapters on national cuisines, for those are full of entertaining cultural speculation, and on the final two chapters, which discuss in an accessible manner theories of food choice. Another option would be to trace the multiple selections that several writers have contributed to the book, coming prepared to characterize each one’s style and attitude and compare and contrast their work. Author Information
Author Interview: New York State Writer's Institute Photo © Lisa Klausner Discussion QuestionsSpecific discussion questions for this book will vary, depending on the approach chosen locally (see the suggestions above), but here are some general approaches: 1. How do the approaches and attitudes toward specific foods (chocolate, spices, meat) voiced by writers in this collection compare/contrast to those put forth in other books that you’ve read in this series? 2. Within any given chapter in this book, you’ll see a range of ideas about the properties of a particular food group, the best way to prepare it, and what it symbolizes culturally. Look at some of the writers who voice attitudes less familiar to you. What can you learn about their culture/time period from what they say about food? 3. Many of the writers in this book are extremely opinionated. What is it about food, in particular, that tends to bring out such strong feelings? Choose a few writers for your discussion. 4. Can you identify historical changes overall in the way that people think about food? What are those? Are the more recent writers necessarily more “right” than the earlier ones? Why or why not? 5. Can you identify any constants in the way that people think about food that transcend the historical and cultural contrasts chronicled in this book? What are they? 6. Which selections here do you particularly like? Why? Do those writers express attitudes toward food that you share?
Last updated: November 29, 2007 - 12:21pm by peggy.mcclendon
|